The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.

The formal verification of a pipelined double-precision IEEE floating-point multiplier

The work

AuthorsMark D. Aagaard; C.-J.H. Seger
Editors
Typemisc
Year1995
Also known asaagaard2002formal
Citekeyaagaard1995formal

Where it appeared

Published inInternational Conference on Computer Aided Design
Pages7--10

From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that, and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.

Abstract

Floating-point circuits are notoriously difficult to design and verify. For verification, simulation barely offers adequate coverage, conventional model-checking techniques are infeasible, and theorem-proving based verification is not sufficiently mature. In this paper we present the formal verification of a radix-eight, pipelined, IEEE double-precision floating-point multiplier. The verification was carried out using a mixture of model-checking and theorem-proving techniques in the Voss hardware verification system. By combining model-checking and theorem-proving we were able to build on the strengths of both areas and achieve significant results with a reasonable amount of effort.

How it got here

How it got hereagent via openalex
Added2026-10-25 10:34 UTC
Not denied bya person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC

Cite it as

@misc{aagaard1995formal,
  title        = {The formal verification of a pipelined double-precision IEEE floating-point multiplier},
  author       = {Mark D. Aagaard and C.-J.H. Seger},
  year         = {1995},
  journal      = {International Conference on Computer Aided Design},
  pages        = {7--10},
  doi          = {10.1109/iccad.1995.479878},
}

This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/aagaard1995formal/ and will keep doing so. It used to be called aagaard2002formal, and those addresses still resolve to this one.