The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
Countermeasures Optimization in Multiple Fault-Injection Context
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
Fault attacks consist in changing the program behavior by injecting faults at run-time, either at hardware or at software level. Their goal is to change the correct progress of the algorithm and hence, either to allow gaining some privilege access or to allow retrieving some secret information based on an analysis of the deviation of the corrupted behavior with respect to the original one. Countermeasures have been proposed to protect embedded systems by adding spatial, temporal or information redundancy at hardware or software level. First we define Countermeasures Check Point (CCP) and CCPs-based countermeasures as an important subclass of countermeasures. Then we propose a methodology to generate an optimal protection scheme for CCPs-based countermeasure. Finally we evaluate our work on a benchmark of code examples with respect to several Control Flow Integrity (CFI) oriented existing protection schemes.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-27 04:21 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@misc{boespflug2020countermeasures,
title = {Countermeasures Optimization in Multiple Fault-Injection Context},
author = {Etienne Boespflug and Cristian Ene and Laurent Mounier and Marie-Laure Potet},
year = {2020},
journal = {Workshop on Fault Detection and Tolerance in Cryptography (FDTC)},
pages = {26--34},
doi = {10.1109/fdtc51366.2020.00011},
}