The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
Comparative Analysis of Crime Scripts: One CCTV Footage—Twenty-One Scripts
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the modelling of crime commission processes, in particular crime scripting, in physical and cyber spaces. This article aims to demonstrate the limits of unstructured scripting approaches, and advocates the development of more systematic techniques. For this, we examined he differences and similarities between various scripts. Twenty-one participants were trained in crime scripting, and tasked to produce individual scripts based on the same video footage of a shop robbery. Content analysis was applied to the scripts, which involved classifying the different steps of the crime commission process and analyzing their distributions. A scoring system was then developed to assess the relative degree of completeness of each script, and linear regression computed using the number of activities included as the predictor variable. This research provides the first evidence of the limits of creating scripts using an intuitive approach, and the need for applying semi-structured goal-based methods.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-28 12:00 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@misc{borrion2017comparative,
title = {Comparative Analysis of Crime Scripts: One CCTV Footage—Twenty-One Scripts},
author = {Hervé Borrion and Hashem Dehghanniri and Yuanxi Li},
year = {2017},
journal = {European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference},
pages = {115--122},
doi = {10.1109/eisic.2017.23},
}