The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
Comparing the victimization impact of cybercrime and traditional crime: Literature review and future research directions
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
This paper addresses the importance of building knowledge on the impact of cybercrime victimization. Because the topic is understudied, it is unclear whether the impact of cybercrime differs from that of traditional crime. Our understanding of potential impact differences needs to be improved, considering that society and criminality are digitizing and, consequently, more people are likely to become victims of cybercrime. From a practical perspective, knowledge about the impact of different crimes is important to develop victim policies within law enforcement and other relevant agencies, and to treat victims appropriately. In this paper, a literature review is provided, as well as future research directions to address the current knowledge gap. The future research directions are divided in three topics: (1) distinguishing between cybercrime and traditional crime, (2) classifying cybercrime and traditional crime, and (3) measuring the victimization impact of cybercrime and traditional crime.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-28 11:36 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@article{borwell2021comparing,
title = {Comparing the victimization impact of cybercrime and traditional crime: Literature review and future research directions},
author = {Jildau Borwell and Jurjen Jansen and Wouter Stol},
year = {2021},
journal = {Journal of Digital Social Research},
volume = {3},
number = {3},
pages = {85--110},
doi = {10.33621/jdsr.v3i3.66},
}