The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.

Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources

The work

AuthorsDavid C. Burr; Marco Turi; Giovanni Anobile
Editors
Typearticle
Year2010
Citekeyburr2010subitizing

Where it appeared

Published inJournal of Vision
PublisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Volume10
Issue6
Pages20

Identifiers

DOI10.1167/10.6.20
OpenAlexW2161653458

From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that, and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.

Abstract

The numerosity of small numbers of objects, up to about four, can be rapidly appraised without error, a phenomenon known as subitizing. Larger numbers can either be counted, accurately but slowly, or estimated, rapidly but with errors. There has been some debate as to whether subitizing uses the same or different mechanisms than those of higher numerical ranges and whether it requires attentional resources. We measure subjects' accuracy and precision in making rapid judgments of numerosity for target numbers spanning the subitizing and estimation ranges while manipulating the attentional load, both with a spatial dual task and the "attentional blink" dual-task paradigm. The results of both attentional manipulations were similar. In the high-load attentional condition, Weber fractions were similar in the subitizing (2-4) and estimation (5-7) ranges (10-15%). In the low-load and single-task condition, Weber fractions substantially improved in the subitizing range, becoming nearly error-free, while the estimation range was relatively unaffected. The results show that the mechanisms operating over the subitizing and estimation ranges are not identical. We suggest that pre-attentive estimation mechanisms works at all ranges, but in the subitizing range, attentive mechanisms also come into play.

How it got here

How it got hereagent via openalex
Added2026-10-29 08:08 UTC
Not denied bya person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC

Cite it as

@article{burr2010subitizing,
  title        = {Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources},
  author       = {David C. Burr and Marco Turi and Giovanni Anobile},
  year         = {2010},
  journal      = {Journal of Vision},
  publisher    = {Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology},
  volume       = {10},
  number       = {6},
  pages        = {20},
  doi          = {10.1167/10.6.20},
}

This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/burr2010subitizing/ and will keep doing so.