Commentary: AI psychosis is not a new threat: Lessons from media-induced delusions

The work

AuthorsPer Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson
Editors
Typearticle
Year2025
Citekeycarlbring2025commentary

Where it appeared

Published inInternet Interventions
Volume42
Pages100882

Abstract

Background: Reports of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots fueling delusions in vulnerable users have popularized the notion of “AI psychosis”. We argue the risk is not unprecedented. Individuals with psychosis have long incorporated books, films, music, and emerging technologies into their delusional thinking. Methods: We review historical parallels, summarize why large language models (LLMs) may reinforce psychotic thinking via sycophancy (excessive agreement or flattery to avoid confrontation), and provide two vignettes contrasting unsafe and safe responses. Results: Contemporary LLMs often avoid confrontation and may collude with delusions, contrary to clinical best practice. Conclusion: The phenomenon is not new in principle, but interactivity potentially changes the risk profile. Clinically aware LLMs that detect and gently redirect early psychotic ideation, while encouraging professional help seeking, could reduce harm. Design should be guided by therapeutic principles and evidence about current model failures.

A copy is held

pdf, 360.1 kB. Not published — it may be under copyright. The facts and links here are.

How it got here

How it got hereimport via bibtex
Added2026-08-04 00:00 UTC
Approved bya person 2026-08-16 15:40 UTC

Cite it as

@article{carlbring2025commentary,
  title        = {Commentary: AI psychosis is not a new threat: Lessons from media-induced delusions},
  author       = {Per Carlbring and Gerhard Andersson},
  year         = {2025},
  journal      = {Internet Interventions},
  volume       = {42},
  pages        = {100882},
  doi          = {10.1016/j.invent.2025.100882},
}

This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/carlbring2025commentary/ and will keep doing so.