The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
The speed of SRT-type dividers is mainly determined by the complexity of the quotient-digit selection, so that implementations are limited to low-radix stages. A scheme is presented in which the quotient-digit is speculated and, when this speculation is incorrect, a rollback or a partial advance is performed. This results in a division operation with a shorter cycle time and a variable number of cycles. Several designs have been realized, and a radix-64 implementation that is 30% faster than the fastest conventional implementation (radix-8) at an increase of about 45% in area per quotient bit has been obtained. A radix-16 implementation that is about 10% faster than the radix-8 conventional one, with the additional advantage of requiring about 25% less area per quotient bit, is also shown.>
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-25 10:39 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@misc{cortadella1993division,
title = {Division with speculation of quotient digits},
author = {Jordi Cortadella and Thomas A. Lang},
year = {1993},
volume = {9},
pages = {87--94},
doi = {10.1109/arith.1993.378105},
}