The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.

A Survey on the Security of Stateful SDN Data Planes

The work

AuthorsTooska Dargahi; Alberto Caponi; Moreno Ambrosin; Giuseppe Bianchi; Mauro Conti
Editors
Typearticle
Year2017
Citekeydargahi2017survey

Where it appeared

Published inIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Volume19
Issue3
Pages1701--1725

From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that, and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.

Abstract

Software-defined networking (SDN) emerged as an attempt to introduce network innovations faster, and to radically simplify and automate the management of large networks. SDN traditionally leverages Open Flow as device-level abstraction. Since OpenFlow permits the programmer to “just” abstract a static flow-table, any stateful control and processing intelligence is necessarily delegated to the network controller. Motivated by the latency and signaling overhead that comes along with such a two-tiered SDN programming model, in the last couple of years several works have proposed innovative switch-level (data plane) programming abstractions capable to deploy some smartness directly inside the network switches, e.g., in the form of localized stateful flow processing. Furthermore, the possible inclusion of states and state maintenance primitives inside the switches is currently being debated in the OpenFlow standardization community itself. In this paper, after having provided the reader with a background on such emerging stateful SDN data plane proposals, we focus our attention on the security implications that data plane programmability brings about. Also via the identification of potential attack scenarios, we specifically highlight possible vulnerabilities specific to stateful in-switch processing (including denial of service and saturation attacks), which we believe should be carefully taken into consideration in the ongoing design of current and future proposals for stateful SDN data planes.

How it got here

How it got hereagent via openalex
Added2026-10-28 21:07 UTC
Not denied bya person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC

Filed under

comst

Cite it as

@article{dargahi2017survey,
  title        = {A Survey on the Security of Stateful SDN Data Planes},
  author       = {Tooska Dargahi and Alberto Caponi and Moreno Ambrosin and Giuseppe Bianchi and Mauro Conti},
  year         = {2017},
  journal      = {IEEE Communications Surveys \& Tutorials},
  publisher    = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers},
  volume       = {19},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {1701--1725},
  doi          = {10.1109/comst.2017.2689819},
}

This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/dargahi2017survey/ and will keep doing so.