| Abstract | No abstract, and the judgement needs stating because the document has a labelled summary and this corpus takes some of those as abstracts.
Leaf 3 is headed "Samenvatting" and does summarise findings: "Het blijkt dat inwoners tijdens crises drie centrale informatiebehoeften hebben: inzicht in de situatie, concrete handelingsperspectieven, informatie over het welzijn van naasten." That is not framing, it is a result -- unlike the executive summaries declined on nsa2024fpga, esf2023securing and wright2017control, which set out background and motivation.
What decides it is length. The Samenvatting runs to several pages: three phases of information need, four elements of effective communication, a discussion of self-reliant and non-self-reliant groups, personas, and the open question of a noodsteunpunt's information position during prolonged power failure. That is a chapter-length condensation of the report, the same shape as the multi-page Summary declined on szayna2001nato, and not the shape of an abstract.
The line this corpus draws, made explicit: a **short labelled summary block** in the front matter is an abstract and is taken as one -- nyquist1924certain's and hartley1928transmission's "SYNOPSIS" are both recorded as the record's abstract. A **chapter-length summary** is a part of the document, and belongs to the reader rather than to the field. Established by reading leaves 3 and 4. |
|---|