The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
The Heartbleed vulnerability took the Internet by surprise in April 2014. The vulnerability, one of the most consequential since the advent of the commercial Internet, allowed attackers to remotely read protected memory from an estimated 24--55% of popular HTTPS sites. In this work, we perform a comprehensive, measurement-based analysis of the vulnerability's impact, including (1) tracking the vulnerable population, (2) monitoring patching behavior over time, (3) assessing the impact on the HTTPS certificate ecosystem, and (4) exposing real attacks that attempted to exploit the bug. Furthermore, we conduct a large-scale vulnerability notification experiment involving 150,000 hosts and observe a nearly 50% increase in patching by notified hosts. Drawing upon these analyses, we discuss what went well and what went poorly, in an effort to understand how the technical community can respond more effectively to such events in the future.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-25 18:52 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@misc{durumeric2014matter,
title = {The Matter of Heartbleed},
author = {Zakir Durumeric and Frank Li and James Kasten and Johanna Amann and Jethro G. Beekman and Mathias Payer and Nicolas Weaver and David Adrian and Vern Paxson and Michael Bailey and J. Alex Halderman},
year = {2014},
pages = {475--488},
doi = {10.1145/2663716.2663755},
}