The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
Human decisions are based on finite information, which makes them inherently imprecise. But what determines the degree of such imprecision? Here, we develop an efficient coding framework for higher-level cognitive processes in which information is represented by a finite number of discrete samples. We characterize the sampling process that maximizes perceptual accuracy or fitness under the often-adopted assumption that full adaptation to an environmental distribution is possible, and show how the optimal process differs when detailed information about the current contextual distribution is costly. We tested this theory on a numerosity discrimination task, and found that humans efficiently adapt to contextual distributions, but in the way predicted by the model in which people must economize on environmental information. Thus, understanding decision behavior requires that we account for biological restrictions on information coding, challenging the often-adopted assumption of precise prior knowledge in higher-level decision systems.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-29 08:44 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@article{heng2020efficient,
title = {Efficient sampling and noisy decisions},
author = {Joseph Heng and Michael Woodford and Rafael Hernán Polanía},
year = {2020},
journal = {eLife},
publisher = {eLife Sciences Publications Ltd},
volume = {9},
doi = {10.7554/elife.54962},
}