Which mathematical logic is the logic of mathematics?

The work

AuthorsJaakko Hintikka
Editors
Typearticle
Year2012
Citekeyhintikka2012which

Where it appeared

Published inLogica Universalis
Volume6
Issue3
Pages459--475

Abstract

The main tool of the arithmetization and logization of analysis in the history of nineteenth century mathematics was an informal logic of quantifiers in the guise of the “epsilon–delta” technique. Mathematicians slowly worked out the problems encountered in using it, but logicians from Frege on did not understand it let alone formalize it, and instead used an unnecessarily poor logic of quantifiers, viz. the traditional, first-order logic. This logic does not e.g. allow the definition and study of mathematicians’ uniformity concepts important in analysis. Mathematicians’ stronger logic was rediscovered around 1990 as the form of independencefriendly logic which hence is not a new logic nor a further development of ordinary first-order logic but a richer version of it.

A copy is held

pdf, 210.8 kB. Not published — it may be under copyright. The facts and links here are.

How it got here

How it got hereimport via bibtex
Added2026-08-04 00:00 UTC
Approved bya person 2026-08-16 15:48 UTC

Cite it as

@article{hintikka2012which,
  title        = {Which mathematical logic is the logic of mathematics?},
  author       = {Jaakko Hintikka},
  year         = {2012},
  journal      = {Logica Universalis},
  volume       = {6},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {459--475},
  doi          = {10.1007/s11787-012-0065-6},
}

This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/hintikka2012which/ and will keep doing so.