The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
It is commonly believed that information spreads between individuals like a pathogen, with each exposure by an informed friend potentially resulting in a naive individual becoming infected. However, empirical studies of social media suggest that individual response to repeated exposure to information is far more complex. As a proxy for intervention experiments, we compare user responses to multiple exposures on two different social media sites, Twitter and Digg. We show that the position of exposing messages on the user-interface strongly affects social contagion. Accounting for this visibility significantly simplifies the dynamics of social contagion. The likelihood an individual will spread information increases monotonically with exposure, while explicit feedback about how many friends have previously spread it increases the likelihood of a response. We provide a framework for unifying information visibility, divided attention, and explicit social feedback to predict the temporal dynamics of user behavior.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-29 13:29 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@article{hodas2014simple,
title = {The Simple Rules of Social Contagion},
author = {Nathan O. Hodas and Kristina Lerman},
year = {2014},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
publisher = {Nature Portfolio},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
pages = {4343},
doi = {10.1038/srep04343},
}