The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
Bridging the Gap between Interaction- and Process-Oriented Choreographies
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
In service oriented computing, choreography languages are used to specify multi-party service compositions. Two main approaches have been followed: the interaction-oriented approach of WS-CDL and the process-oriented approach of BPEL4Chor. We investigate the relationship between them.In particular, we consider several interpretations for interaction-oriented choreographies spanning from synchronous to asynchronous communication. Under each of these interpretations we characterize the class of interaction-oriented choreographies which have a process-oriented counterpart, and we formalize the notion of equivalence between the initial interaction-oriented choreography and the corresponding process-oriented one.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-26 20:33 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@misc{lanese2008bridging,
title = {Bridging the Gap between Interaction- and Process-Oriented Choreographies},
author = {Ivan Lanese and Claudio Guidi and Fabrizio Montesi and Gianluigi Zavattaro},
year = {2008},
journal = {IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM)},
pages = {323--332},
doi = {10.1109/sefm.2008.11},
}