The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
Author’s commentary In this article we see how already in 1967 category theory had made explicit a number of conceptual advances that were entering into the everyday practice of mathematics. For example, local Galois connections (in algebraic geometry, model theory, linear algebra, etc.) are globalized into functors, such as Spec, carrying much more information. Also, “theories ” (even when presented symbolically) are viewed explicitly as categories; so are the background universes of sets that serve as the recipients for models. (Models themselves are functors, hence preserve the fundamental operation of substitution/composition in terms of which the other logical operations can be characterized as local adjoints.) My 1963 observation (referred to by Eilenberg and Kelly in La Jolla, 1965), that cartesian closed categories serve as a common abstraction of type theory and propositional logic, permits an invariant algebraic treatment of the essential problem of proof theory, though most of the later work by proof theorists still relies on presentation-dependent formulations. This article sums up a stage of the development of the relationship between
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-25 07:31 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@article{lawvere1969adjointness,
title = {Adjointness in Foundations},
author = {F. William Lawvere},
year = {1969},
journal = {dialectica},
publisher = {Wiley},
volume = {23},
number = {3/4},
pages = {281--296},
doi = {10.1111/j.1746-8361.1969.tb01194.x},
}