The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
Temporal numerosity discrimination was investigated for visual, auditory and tactile senses. Trains of two to nine signals (flashes, clicks, taps) were presented at rates of from 3 per sec. to 8 per se. The subjects were instructed specifically to report only the number of signals counted. Significant modality differences were obtained. Auditory counts were almost perfectly accurate inder all conditions. Visual judgement of number, which were consistently the least accurate, were underestimated. The error increased appreciably as the rate increased from 3 per sec. to 6 per sec. but decreased with rates of 7 per sec. and 8 per sec. Tactile reports also underestimated the actual number of signals, the underestimation increasing linearly as a function of rate.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-29 08:56 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@article{lechelt1975temporal,
title = {TEMPORAL NUMEROSITY DISCRIMINATION: INTERMODAL COMPARISONS REVISITED},
author = {Eugene C. Lechelt},
year = {1975},
journal = {British Journal of Psychology},
publisher = {Wiley},
volume = {66},
number = {1},
pages = {101--108},
doi = {10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01444.x},
}