The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.

Scaling and Scheduling to Maximize Application Performance within Budget Constraints in Cloud Workflows

The work

AuthorsMing Mao; Marty Humphrey
Editors
Typemisc
Year2013
Citekeymao2013scaling

Where it appeared

Published inIEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Pages67--78

Identifiers

DOI10.1109/ipdps.2013.61
OpenAlexW2156034528

From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that, and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.

Abstract

It remains a challenge to provision resources in the cloud such that performance is maximized and financial cost is minimized. A fixed budget can be used to rent a wide variety of resource configurations for varying durations. The two steps - resource acquisition and scheduling/allocation - are dependent on each other and are particularly difficult when considering complex resource usage such as workflows, where task precedence need to be preserved and the budget constraint is assigned for the whole cloud application instead of every single job. The ability to acquire resources dynamically and trivially in the cloud - while being incredibly powerful and useful - exacerbates this particular resource acquisition and scheduling problem. In this paper, we design, implement and evaluate two auto-scaling solutions to minimize job turnaround time within budget constraints for cloud workflows. The scheduling-first algorithm distributes the application-wide budget to each individual job, determines the fastest execution plan and then acquires the cloud resources, while the scaling-first algorithm determines the size and the type of the cloud resources first and then schedules the workflow jobs on the acquired instances. The scaling-first algorithm shows better performance when the budget is low while the scheduling-first algorithm performs better when the budget is high. The two algorithms can reduce the job turnaround time by 9.6% - 45.2% compared to choosing a fixed general machine type. Moreover, they show good tolerance (between -10.2% and 16.7%) to inaccurate parameters (±20% estimation error).

How it got here

How it got hereagent via openalex
Added2026-10-29 05:41 UTC
Not denied bya person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC

Cite it as

@misc{mao2013scaling,
  title        = {Scaling and Scheduling to Maximize Application Performance within Budget Constraints in Cloud Workflows},
  author       = {Ming Mao and Marty Humphrey},
  year         = {2013},
  journal      = {IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)},
  publisher    = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers},
  pages        = {67--78},
  doi          = {10.1109/ipdps.2013.61},
}

This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/mao2013scaling/ and will keep doing so.