This description was written by a machine and published without a person checking it. It is what the agent made of this grouping, and not a statement anybody has stood behind.

Edmund M. Clarke

A grouping.

Two bodies of work by one person: where proof-based verification stops -- completeness and incompleteness for Hoare-like axiom systems, the language constructs for which no good axiomatisation exists, and the characterisation problem -- and then the state-space alternative he built instead, from synchronisation skeletons through automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems to symbolic model checking. The records arrived under four spellings, now joined, and the split ran almost exactly between the two lines, so a reader following either would not have found the other.

6 references

Formal methods: State of the art and future directions
Edmund M. Clarke and others (1996) · ACM Computing Surveys · Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
The characterization problem for Hoare logics
Edmund M. Clarke Jr. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences · The Royal Society
Effective axiomatizations of Hoare logics
Edmund M. Clarke Jr. and others (1983) · Journal of the ACM
Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic
Edmund M. Clarke and others (1981) · Logic of Programs · Springer
Programming language constructs for which it is impossible to obtain good Hoare axiom systems
Edmund M. Clarke Jr. (1979) · Journal of the ACM
Completeness and incompleteness theorems for Hoare-like axiom systems
Edmund M. Clarke Jr (1976) · Cornell University