The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York
The work
| Authors | Timo Seidl |
|---|---|
| Editors | |
| Type | article |
| Year | 2020 |
| Citekey | seidl2020politics |
Where it appeared
| Published in | Regulation & Governance |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 357--374 |
Identifiers
| DOI | 10.1111/rego.12353 |
|---|---|
| ISSN | 1748-5983 |
Access
| Landing page | https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12353 |
|---|
From crossref.
Abstract
AbstractPlatform companies like Uber not only disrupt existing markets but also contest existing regulatory regimes. This raises the question of how, when, and why such companies are regulated. This article develops, tests, and defends a theoretical framework that explains the politics of regulatory response to the rise of platform capitalism. Using discourse network analysis and a case study on the regulation of Uber in New York, it shows that the success or failure of regulations depends on the ability of actors to mobilize broad coalition; that narratives affect the composition of these coalitions; and that platform companies have both unique political strengths and vulnerabilities. This article makes substantive contributions to our understanding of the politics of platform capitalism, and it makes theoretical contributions to the literature studies on coalitional politics, ideational institutionalism, and business power.
How it got here
| How it got here | agent via crossref |
|---|---|
| Added | 2026-10-23 11:59 UTC |
| Not denied by | a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC |
Cite it as
@article{seidl2020politics,
title = {The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York},
author = {Timo Seidl},
year = {2020},
journal = {Regulation \& Governance},
publisher = {Wiley},
volume = {16},
number = {2},
pages = {357--374},
issn = {1748-5983},
doi = {10.1111/rego.12353},
}
This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/seidl2020politics/ and will keep doing so.