The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
Search systems, like many other applications of machine learning, have become increasingly complex and opaque. The notions of relevance, usefulness, and trustworthiness with respect to information were already overloaded and often difficult to articulate, study, or implement. Newly surfaced proposals that aim to use large language models to generate relevant information for a user’s needs pose even greater threat to transparency, provenance, and user interactions in a search system. In this perspective paper we revisit the problem of search in the larger context of information seeking and argue that removing or reducing interactions in an effort to retrieve presumably more relevant information can be detrimental to many fundamental aspects of search, including information verification, information literacy, and serendipity. In addition to providing suggestions for counteracting some of the potential problems posed by such models, we present a vision for search systems that are intelligent and effective, while also providing greater transparency and accountability.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-23 14:08 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@misc{shah2022situating,
title = {Situating Search},
author = {Chirag Suresh Shah and Emily M. Bender},
year = {2022},
journal = {ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR)},
pages = {221--232},
doi = {10.1145/3498366.3505816},
}