The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
Rebutting Existing Misconceptions About Multiple Imputation as a Method for Handling Missing Data
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
Missing data is a problem that occurs frequently in many scientific areas. The most sophisticated method for dealing with this problem is multiple imputation. Contrary to other methods, like listwise deletion, this method does not throw away information, and partly repairs the problem of systematic dropout. Although from a theoretical point of view multiple imputation is considered to be the optimal method, many applied researchers are reluctant to use it because of persistent misconceptions about this method. Instead of providing an(other) overview of missing data methods, or extensively explaining how multiple imputation works, this article aims specifically at rebutting these misconceptions, and provides applied researchers with practical arguments supporting them in the use of multiple imputation.
How it got here
How it got here
agent via openalex
Added
2026-10-28 11:21 UTC
Not denied by
a person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC
Cite it as
@article{vanginkel2020rebutting,
title = {Rebutting Existing Misconceptions About Multiple Imputation as a Method for Handling Missing Data},
author = {Joost R. van Ginkel and Mariëlle Linting and Ralph C. A. Rippe and Anja van der Voort},
year = {2020},
journal = {Journal of Personality Assessment},
publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
volume = {102},
number = {3},
pages = {297--308},
doi = {10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680},
}