The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.

A Suggestion for a Fast Multiplier

The work

AuthorsChristopher S. Wallace
Editors
Typearticle
Year1964
Citekeywallace1964suggestion

Where it appeared

Published inIEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
VolumeEC-13
Issue1
Pages14--17

From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that, and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.

Abstract

It is suggested that the economics of present large-scale scientific computers could benefit from a greater investment in hardware to mechanize multiplication and division than is now common. As a move in this direction, a design is developed for a multiplier which generates the product of two numbers using purely combinational logic, i.e., in one gating step. Using straightforward diode-transistor logic, it appears presently possible to obtain products in under 1, μsec, and quotients in 3 μsec. A rapid square-root process is also outlined. Approximate component counts are given for the proposed design, and it is found that the cost of the unit would be about 10 per cent of the cost of a modern large-scale computer.

How it got here

How it got hereagent via openalex
Added2026-10-25 11:06 UTC
Not denied bya person 2026-10-29 17:12 UTC

Cite it as

@article{wallace1964suggestion,
  title        = {A Suggestion for a Fast Multiplier},
  author       = {Christopher S. Wallace},
  year         = {1964},
  journal      = {IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers},
  publisher    = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers},
  volume       = {EC-13},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {14--17},
  doi          = {10.1109/pgec.1964.263830},
}

This record lives at https://refs.drheap.org/wallace1964suggestion/ and will keep doing so.