The bibliographic entry was discovered and compiled by a machine, and published without a person checking it against the publication. The publication itself is the authors' own work — this badge says nothing about it.
From OpenAlex, which stores abstracts as an
index of words and their positions: what is shown is rebuilt from that,
and reads fluently whether or not it is what the author wrote.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a framework to observe RPKI relying parties (i.e., those that fetch RPKI data from the distributed repository) and present insights into this ecosystem for the first time. Our longitudinal study of data gathered from three RPKI certification authorities (AFRINIC, APNIC, and our own CA) identifies different deployment models of relying parties and (surprisingly) prevalent inconsistent fetching behavior that affects Internet routing robustness. Our results reveal nearly 90% of relying parties are unable to connect to delegated publication points under certain conditions, which leads to erroneous invalidation of IP prefixes and likely widespread loss of network reachability.
@misc{kristoff2020measuring,
title = {On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties},
author = {John Kristoff and Randy Bush and Chris Kanich and George Michaelson and Amreesh Phokeer and Thomas C. Schmidt and Matthias Wählisch},
year = {2020},
journal = {ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC)},
pages = {484--491},
doi = {10.1145/3419394.3423622},
}